Top Gun: Maverick Review: Is It Worth Watching This Movie?

Have you watched the amazing movie by Tom Cruise “Top Gun: Maverick”? If not And you are planning to watch a movie and first want to know the review you have come to the right place. In this article, we will discuss the audience review and our call about this movie. Please read this article for all information. In addition, if this article was useful, please offer feedback. Your feedback is precious to us.

Joseph Kosinski is in charge of the 2022 American action movie Top Gun: Maverick. It is the sequel to Top Gun, which came out in 1986, and the second movie in the Top Gun series. The movie is based on stories by Peter Craig and Justin Marks and was written by Ehren Kruger, Eric Warren Singer, and Christopher McQuarrie.

Tom Cruise and Val Kilmer play the same roles they did in the first movie. Miles Teller, Jennifer Connelly, Jon Hamm, Glen Powell, Lewis Pullman, and Ed Harris also return from the first movie. In the movie, Maverick faces his past while preparing a group of younger Top Gun graduates, including the son of his late best friend, for a dangerous mission.

Some of the Comments by the Audience on Top Gun: Maverick!

  • A summer blockbuster of the old school, with rust-bucket F-14s duking it out with young pups in F-18s, all shot on celluloid rather than sketched in by computers, at the behest of a star who refuses to quit.
  • Brings Maverick’s story full circle in a satisfying manner that adds depth and dimension to its predecessor, but still tells a story that’s all it’s own.
  • Joe Kosinski matches his well-established architectural precision with suitably nostalgic but never pandering emotionality, while Cruise commands the screen in a performance that leverages his multimillion-dollar star wattage to brighten the entire film.
  • It helps that the filmmaking is pretty much impeccable, with director Joseph Kosinski providing the kind of clear, streamlined action sequences that make blockbuster spectacle feel fun instead of mandatory.
  • It contains just as many formulaic narrative sops and expected character beats as the original, but the streamlining of the simple storyline provides a breeziness that befits and benefits the picture.
  • Like its predecessor, it thrives on military fetishism, a**hole energy, and the suspension of belief usually reserved for latter-day Liam Neeson fight scenes.
  • One more piece of advice: See it in a theater. A big, loud, and crowded one. See it with the fans. That’s the way these summer blockbuster blasts were designed to work.

Read More: 

Top Gun: Maverick Review

Our Call: The first of these meetings is with Rear Adm. Chester Cain, who is played by Ed Harris as a rusty piece of brass with an impressive flight record. (There wouldn’t have been a “Top Gun” without “The Right Stuff.) He looks like he’s trying to tell Pete that the game is over. Because of new technology, people like him are almost no longer needed.

Based on this scene, you might think that the movie is going to be about American air power in the age of drone warfare, but that will have to wait for the next sequel. Pete still has a job to do. Officially, it’s a job as a teacher, but we’ll get to that. The conversation with Cain isn’t so much a distraction as it is an explanation of itself.

Pete, as I’m sure you already know, is a stand-in for Tom Cruise, and the main question this movie asks has less to do with whether or not we need combat pilots and more to do with how important movie stars are. Do we really need guys like this or movies like this when we have all this cool new technology and can watch 37 episodes of Silicon Valley grifting without leaving our couches?

It makes no difference. Once the mission starts, we never see the faces of the enemy pilots. This makes it clear that “Top Gun: Maverick” has nothing to say about geopolitics and everything to do with defending old-fashioned movie values against the nihilism of the streaming age.

Does the defense succeed? The intense and exciting combat scenes serve as constant reminders that flight has been one of the greatest joys in cinema virtually since its inception. The plot is inconsistent. Despite the emotional upheavals and physical risks that poor Maverick must deal with—his job, his love life, and his need to uphold the memory of his deceased friend—not to mention G-forces and flak—the dramatic stakes seem eerily low.

“Top Gun: Maverick” is not a wonderful movie, despite what you may have heard. The film is weak, very demanding, and occasionally quite enjoyable. But maybe, more importantly, it is a sincere proclamation of the premise that great movies can and should exist. I was old enough to remember when that was common knowledge. I’m almost as old as Maverick, for Pete’s sake. You can also watch the trailer below:

Ratings of Top Gun: Maverick

When judging a show, everyone looks at its rating. Most of the time, the best way to know if a show will continue to air is to look at how well it does in the ratings. As your rank goes up, your chances of making it are better. The show has a good IMDb rating of 8.4/10 and a good audience rating of 96% on Rotten Tomatoes.


All the updates of Top Gun Maverick Review have been posted in this article. All the future details of Top Gun Maverick Review will be updated soon on our website, so if you liked reading this article, then don’t forget to share it with your other friends and family members. Also, visit our website to know any details of Top Gun Maverick Review.

The Shahab’s main goal is to provide updates on many popular TV series, web series, movies, and anime series. Hence, if you wish to know anything about your favorite show, visit our website, The Shahab.

Comments are closed.